You know, despite S's fanfare about my official position (as exemplified
with his Dominion War series), I want to be a little more clear on this
thingy.
First off, I think JOC's acting in S1 and S2 was just fine. Not great,
granted but not subpar either. Then in S3 it went downhill. Despite
the total inconvenience of the loss of the Professor, the show was still
able to go on its own momentum. The reason: JOC. JOC may not have been
a great actor, and he might have shown contempt for the show, but he
was the leader. He was the nerdy whiz kid that everyone wants to be
who fell in love (or so we want to think) with the girl next door. He
was the figurehead.
And you say, "What the f*ck is the importance of the figurehead?"
It is everything. Without Joan of Arc the French could have never retaken
Rheims for their king. She was a noted strategist, granted, but she
was worth more to the King and to the history books as a figurehead.
Before some of you radicals go bananas on me, I'm not a JOC lover.
I'm not a JOC hater either. Mr.OC was the heart of the show until season
five when Cleavant Derricks took over and performed the task of the
figurehead admirably. But you must remember that Rembrandt was never
meant to be such a tacit leader for our sliders, and I'm sure the creators
and producers of the early episodes never envisioned him that way. Nevertheless,
Derricks' character underwent a transmogrification from season three
to now, and we see the modern Rembrandt leading our sliders.
However, that does not change the fact that the figurehead role was
meant for JOC. JOC (not to be confused with COC, whose acting has just
began to improve) was the heart of the show, if I may stress so.
Before JOC, we had the loss of Wade and Arturo. When they left, we
hadn't lost 1/2 of the Sliders. We lost all of them. They are like the
essential organs: lose one and the rest are worthless.
Needless to say, I don't dislike season five for that reason. Season
five was just fine. It had good acting, some good writing, good production
even. So what's my problem you say? That was only half of it. The other
half is who's there. Rembrandt was there, but he was changed, different.
Not necessarily for the worst, but he was different. He became a leader
when those who he grew to know and love finally departed. Rembrandt
was meant to be the washed up singer, looking for a way back to his
homeworld. But he became the hopeless leader, looking for a way to salve
what little of his life that is left. Such was season five: finding
a way around a hopeless situation.
Which is why I didn't like it.
Well, there! That was probably my first official rant! How do you like
them apples, Hunter, S?
LM